Which Online Gambling Providers Are Right For You?

If you are considering playing at an online casino or online poker site, you have many options available to you. However, not all of these options will be suitable for you. Here are a few things to keep in mind before making a decision.


Microgaming is one of the biggest names in the online gambling industry. Founded in 1998, it has been a pioneering force in the creation of high quality software and gaming products for the web. The company is now known for creating some of the world’s most popular casino games.

The company is also a founding member of the Interactive Gaming Council and eCOGRA. It offers a full suite of products for both the online and land-based market. Aside from casino games, the company also offers consumer technology and training.

As part of its strategy to keep bettors interested, Microgaming has produced a number of interesting new games. Among these is the Major Millions slot, which has won a number of big money jackpots. This game has three reels and 15 paylines.


NetEnt is an online gambling software provider that has been in the industry for over 20 years. It provides a wide range of innovative solutions to casino operators. These include table games, slot machines, and video poker.

NetEnt also provides a Live Casino platform. This technology allows players to interact with live dealers in real-time. The result is a virtual gambling experience that is almost as good as playing in a real casino.

Another popular NetEnt product is its progressive jackpot slots. Some of these slots have paid out millions of dollars to lucky winners. In particular, the Mega Fortune TM slot has produced a record-setting jackpot.

Although there are plenty of other casinos with similar offerings, you will find that NetEnt stands out in many ways. First of all, the company has received several awards. One of these is the EGR Slot Provider Award.


Yggdrasil is a casino software provider. It offers high quality gaming software. The company has offices in Malta, Gibraltar and Poland. This means that Yggdrasil operates in a variety of regulated online gambling markets.

Yggdrasil’s gaming software includes top quality graphics and seamless gameplay. The company is also known for offering innovative features. Among other things, Yggdrasil offers a centralized prize pool. With this system, players from all over the world can participate in a jackpot.

Yggdrasil is a member of the Swedish Gambling Association. There are over 300 Yggdrasil casinos across the world. Some casinos offer free spins, deposit bonuses, and even a matched bonus.

Yggdrasil offers games for a variety of devices. Players can access games from PC, Mac, or mobile. Yggdrasil slots are not as popular as those produced by other companies, but there are plenty of options available. Yggdrasil has developed more than forty original slots.


Nicolaou and his ilk have made a splash in the gambling industry. The duo have already taken down the most prestigious of the lot, but they may not be in the same league for too long. They are a couple of slick operators, but not too slick to have a decent hand. If you want to score big, you are probably going to have to move to the next best thing. Alternatively, you might be able to stay put, but you are probably going to have to do so on your own two feet. Fortunately, a bit of planning and research will help you score a ring or two at your favorite local casino. In fact, you might be able to get a freebie as a welcome bonus if you have a few well-kept secrets to share.

Lopez v. Attorney General

Guerrero Lopez filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Courts – Texas Western District against the Attorney General for the State. The suit claims that the BIA erred in rejecting her asylum claim, based on her claims of past persecution.

In November 2011, the Attorney General for the State responded to the complaint by arguing that the law was a constitutional exercise of congressional power. He also argued that section 1473.7 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) was inapplicable to Lopez. Despite this argument, the court declined to dismiss the case, because Lopez had not raised a legal error.

The United States Supreme Court granted Lopez’s petition for review. This decision was based on a court’s assessment of the credibility of Lopez’s statements in open court.